Unit-distance disproof
OpenAI announced an AI-produced disproof of Erdos's unit-distance conjecture in May 2026. The result uses algebraic number theory where planar intuition expected a lattice-like story.
Sundog Geometry
This is the public shelf for geometry workbenches: small visual problems where the visible pattern is not the whole story. Cap sets are the live demo. The unit-distance disproof is the fresh external discovery. Sundog's role is the apparatus beside them: source credit, hidden structure, visible signature, and named boundaries.
The May 2026 unit-distance result is external work announced by OpenAI and checked by mathematicians. Sundog did not prove it.
The cap-set demo points to Croot-Lev-Pach and Ellenberg-Gijswijt's 2016 polynomial-method breakthrough.
The page is a primer and apparatus exhibit, not a claim that Sundog has solved a discrete-geometry problem.
Live demo
The cap-set problem is a good first stop because the rule is tactile: place dots, avoid three-term lines. The shock is that the winning idea was not more dot-gazing. It was a polynomial method over a finite field.
On `/capset`, a visitor can click points in F_3^n, watch forbidden triples light up, load small maximum cap sets, and compare the trivial 3^n ceiling with the Ellenberg-Gijswijt bound curve.
The point is not to teach the full proof. It is to make the shape of the breakthrough feel concrete: the visible grid is easy, but the decisive structure lives elsewhere.
The side-by-side apparatus
A new discovery does not become Sundog evidence just because it rhymes with Sundog. The useful move is side-by-side: cite the discovery, explain the visible problem, then show the apparatus Sundog uses when it suspects a visible signature is downstream of hidden structure.
OpenAI announced an AI-produced disproof of Erdos's unit-distance conjecture in May 2026. The result uses algebraic number theory where planar intuition expected a lattice-like story.
Planned exhibit: split the announcement into proved, externally verified, observational, editorial, and aspirational claims. The output is a bounded reading, not a counter-proof or endorsement shortcut.
Planned note: classify the long stalemate as residual, coverage, or detection failure, then ask outside mathematicians whether that classification is coherent or just Sundog vocabulary pasted onto history.
Claim boundary: this geometry page can say that cap-set, halo geometry, and unit-distance have a shared educational shape: visible pattern, hidden construction, boundary-aware reading. It cannot say Sundog proved cap-set, solved unit-distance, or validated a general geometry theorem.
Workbench shelf
The geometry page is a container, not a single demo. Capset is active now. The halo atlas and h-of-x are already public. The AI-math apparatus rails are staged until their notes and review paths earn a stronger public position.
Clickable F_3^n primer for finite-field lines, small maximum caps, and the polynomial-method bound.
Atmospheric-optics atlas for parhelia and halo-family vocabulary, separated from the broader geometry shelf.
A small inverse handle: recover eligible hidden sun altitude from photographed parhelion offset.
Future side-by-side reading of the OpenAI result with citation rail, evidence tiers, and explicit boundaries.
A careful note asking whether parhelion, cap-set, and unit-distance share structure or only a convenient slogan.
Three-body symmetry descent remains a research sidecar. Its current lesson is process discipline: do not rescue a count after a cheap precheck collapses.
Sources and credit
Primary announcement for the May 2026 result and its context.
Open sourceThe proof document linked from the announcement.
Open PDFMathematician commentary and context around the result.
Open PDFCap-set bound paper: large subsets of F_q^n with no three-term progressions.
Open arXivThe polynomial-method precursor on progression-free sets in Z_4^n.
Open arXivInternal claim-boundary staging for this geometry shelf.
Open ledger