{
  "_meta": {
    "name": "p20",
    "photo": "20.gettyimages-157530019-2048x2048.jpg",
    "anchored": "2026-05-13",
    "method": "Task #55 fallback CZA diagnostic; visual R22 hypotheses 430/455/500 all put CZA apex above frame",
    "status": "CZA not applicable / cropped; do not use as CZA-apex residual",
    "note": "The upper glow aligns with the 22-degree halo / upper-tangent region. Watermark and flare contamination make this a lower-confidence parhelia/belt reference."
  },
  "sun": [1011, 827],
  "r22": 455,
  "r22_source": "parhelion-derived",
  "r22_source_note": "p20 shows no continuous 22° halo arc — only parhelia and a sun pillar. R22 was set from the parhelion offsets, so the parhelion-route residual is tautological on this photo. Audit memo §2 item 7 confirms. Pass B1 classification 2026-05-13; ineligible for parhelion-route promotion regardless of residual.",
  "sun_altitude": 5,
  "parhelion": {
    "left_x": 554,
    "right_x": 1468,
    "y": 804,
    "visibility": "provisional low-sun estimate; right side is contaminated by watermark/flare"
  },
  "cza": {
    "visibility": "not_applicable_cropped",
    "predicted_apex": [1011, -83],
    "note": "With R22 ~= 455, R46 ~= 910, so predicted CZA apex y = 827 - 910 = -83."
  }
}